Criminal Theory Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Criminal Theory - Research Paper ExampleThe paper also deals with the ballpark models used by society to determine which acts are considered to be criminal, how they are affected by preference theories, and how they are enforced by the government. It is essential to identify the various select theories and how they contribute to an in judgment understanding of how wickednesss are being perceived by the society and the criminal justice system. Regoli and Hewitt drop do some remarkable studies on the various choice theories on crimes and for the researchers choice theories hold that people have free will, are logical and intelligent, and make informed decisions to commit crimes based on whether they believe they will benefit from doing so (Regoli & Hewitt 66). Thus, an individual has the free will to decide whether to commit a crime or refrain from it in given situations. The ultimate choice of indulging in crimes rests on the individual himself. rattling often, individuals co mmit crimes only after evaluating the possible benefits as well as the consequences of the action in their lives. It grass thus be inferred that individuals tend to keep themselves away from crimes when such consequences of crimes would lead them to pain, punishment, imprisonment or regular death penalty. Choice theories can generally be categorized into rational choice supposition, the routine activities theory and the life style theory. All these choice theories underline the fact that people are more abandoned to commit crimes when right opportunities arise and there is nothing to deter or de-motivate them from such choices. The rational choice theory was developed and propagated by Ronald Clarke and Derek Cornish. The authors turn over that offenders are rational people who make calculated choices in front they commit a criminal act and as such they collect, process, and evaluate information about the crime they weigh the costs and benefits of the crime before they make th e decision to commit it (Regoli & Hewitt 67). Thus, the rational choice theorists argue that offenders commit planned crimes where they decide whom to target and in what way to operate their criminal activities. The theory has cracking significance in the criminal justice system. It is imperative that there are powerful provisions of punishment and deterrence in the criminal justice system to put an end to rational choice crimes. From a rational choice perspective the decisions of the offenders regarding the crime are quite purposive, intentional and deliberative. However, these decisions can be slanted on limited information, made under pressure, insufficiently planned, and/or attentive only to the immediate risks of perceptiveness rather than to the long-term consequences of their actions (Lilly, Ball & Cullen 342). Most often, crimes based on choice theories stem from the offenders attempts to satisfy his/her needs to earn money, acquire social status or to take revenge. On th e former(a) hand, the offender would always try to get rid of the negative consequences of the crime which include arrest, punishment and imprisonment. However, rational choice theory does not focus very much on the background factors that are twisting in the making of crimes. On the other hand, rational choice t