Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Analysing the measure likelihood of success on the merits Assignment

Analysing the measure likelihood of conquest on the merits - Assignment ExampleIn addition, the applicants attorney should prove to the hail that bowel movement has been made to stop to notify the adverse party and should give the reasons to maintain the claim that no court notice is required or the adverse party. The case of Ben Njoroge Muchunu & 2 others v Phares Muchunu & 2 others 2013 eKLR. In case, the applicants seek an order of temporary throttlet to prohibit the plaintiff and the defendant against issuing the share of $52,000 as the harvest-home from the sale of an estate to the late Benjamin Njoroge Wamanja. The applicants claimed that the money way held in the banks account in the label of the defendants and the plaintiffs affidavit. The basis of success was the fact that the applicants did not face any objection in their claim since at that place was no affidavit to deny the applicants claim. Therefore, in cases of denial of the issuance of a court injunction the a pplicants were empower to suffer permanent damages that neither the defendant nor the plaintiff would compensate the applicant (Henry 47). The other alternating(a) available is for the plaintiff and the defendant to establish to the court how they would compensate the applicants. In NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S. Ct. 710, 11 L. Ed. 2d 686 1964. The New York times made a detailed publicizing titled paying attention their rising Voices in a bid to raise funds to protect martin Luther King Jr against an Albama denunciation of phony swearing. The Alabama court denied the application of temporary restraining order of defamation of Montogery Safety commissioner, L.B. Sullivan who was the police supervisor. The court claimed that the advertisement made by the New York Times did not mention Sullivan hence the commissioner had no base to challenge the press for defamation. Also, these facts are evident in American Chicle Co. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., 208 F.2d 560, 563 (2d Cir. 1953) (L. Hand, J.). The failure of the plaintiff was as a result of lack of evidence of defamation hence the press could not be untalkative from exercising their freedom of speech. In the case of Data General Corp. v. Digital Computer Controls, Inc 1971. The data usual corporation exposed design information through its Nova 1200 mini ready reckoner informing the owners of its secrecy of the design drawings in a contract agreement. Digital computer controls designed its minicomputer that resembled that of digital General Corporation that had sued in court to restrain digital computer controls against the use of heir technology illegally. The court help that a digital computer controls had breached the secrecy rights of the digital general corporation (Patterson 334). The bases for success of the digital general corporation case against digital computer controls were the fact that digital general corporation had applied sufficient security for their drawings hence digital computer controls breached the contractual terms by using confidential information for personal gain. In Carlill v. Carbolic slew Ball Co. 1893 Q.B. 256 (C.A.). the carbolic smoke ball company placed a newspaper advertisement promising coke pounds to any person who consumed smoke balls three times in a day as tell by the company. Carlill consumed the smoke balls as directed and contracted influenza. She claimed the reward from the company, but the company denounced any contractual obligation with Carlill. The court applied temporary

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.